Showing Tag: "scotus" (Show all posts)

Supreme Court upholds Obamacare again

Posted by Timothy McBride on Thursday, June 25, 2015, In : ACA 

The Supreme Court decided today on the “Obamacare” case, called “King v. Burwell” and ruled in a 6-3 decision to support the Administration’s position on the law, that subsidies should be allowable in federal marketplaces.  The Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy joined the four liberals (Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan and Sotomayor) in the decision.  Find the decision here.

The decision is important for the continued implementation of the Affordable Care Act, and means that perhaps a...


Continue reading ...
 

Awaiting SCOTUS case on subsidies: liberal justices on majority opinions all year

Posted by Timothy McBride on Tuesday, June 9, 2015, In : ACA 

Today I was looking at a New York Times article, which listed how the justices voted on "major" cases this session, and one thing struck me -- on each and every case all four so-called liberal Justices (Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan and Sotomayor) voted in the MAJORITY on each and every case, sometimes joined (of course) by 1-5 other justices, most frequently Kennedy, Roberts.  The three most conservative justices (Thomas, Scalia, Alito) were least often on these cases.

This led me to think about th...
Continue reading ...
 

SCOTUS (III): Smoking gun (CBO score) proves plaintiffs case has no merit

Posted by Timothy McBride on Monday, November 10, 2014, In : ACA 

As I mentioned in two previous posts, the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) this past week decided to take the case of an appeal of a ruling by the 4th Circuit US federal court of appeals (King v. Burwell), in a case where the plaintiffs allege the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is ambiguous or conflicted on whether subsidies can be offered to lower-income persons who obtain coverage through Marketplaces established and run by the federal government.

Earlier I pointed out two huge flaws in the argument of the...
Continue reading ...
 

SCOTUS (II): Legislative intent of ACA always clear, key Senate-House chairs say

Posted by Timothy McBride on Sunday, November 9, 2014, In : ACA 
As I noted earlier, the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) this past week decided to take the case of an appeal of a ruling by the 4th Circuit US federal court of appeals (King v. Burwell), in a case where the plaintiffs allege the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is ambiguous or conflicted on whether subsidies can be offered to lower-income persons who obtain coverage through Marketplaces established and run by the federal government.

My earlier post pointed to some fatal flaws in the arguments of the plaintiff...
Continue reading ...
 

SCOTUS (I): Why the case against the ACA at Supreme Court has no merit

Posted by Timothy McBride on Sunday, November 9, 2014, In : ACA 

The Supreme Court has decided to take a case, ruling on another aspect of the legality of a key provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), whether it is legal for the federal government to provide subsidies for insurance coverage under the federal Marketplaces.  Though nearly every scholar has cast serious doubt on the logic of the case made by the plaintiffs, the Court has decided to take the case, likely because at least four Justices have certainly expressed their strong skepticism on the...


Continue reading ...
 
 

About Me


Timothy McBride Timothy D. McBride, Ph.D. is a Professor at the Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis. Here you can find musings on health policy and other issues. Opinions are my own, and not those of my employer. Contact: mcbridetd@gmail.com